Gideon's profilePerfect FuturesPhotosBlogListsMore ![]() | Help |
Perfect FuturesLife as a photographer who wants to learn more... |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
October 17 CEATEC Exhibit 2009Here is our report from the latest CEATEC show, which I went to here in Japan. It well outshone the rather muted 2009 Tokyo Games Show, in terms of offering exciting and innovative technologies. I don’t think anyone could fail to be amazed by some of the goodies on offer here. The main focus was on 3D backlit LED TV’s.
If you have ever seen the Terminator experience at Disney Land, you will know what to expect, minus the dry ice. It is exciting, if ultimately a little tacky and I found that objects converging in the centre of the screen tended to break the effect and be seen in duplicate- acceptable for a game or cartoon, but not what you want for an engaging movie. Who knows, maybe it’s just my eyes, but I think such problems will need to be fixed if it is to become the norm. Yet norm it will surely be, just as colour TV replaced black and white. It is exciting to see such a future being born.
I was also impressed by one of Sony’s new ‘toys’- an adapter for a compact that swivels around, using face-detection and even smile detection to take snaps of friends at parties. Seeing it zoom, pan, tilt and actually find faces effectively was quite a sight. To an extent, it does actually work, though it seemed to confuse grimaces at having a camera see someone with an actual smile!
Next to this was a theatre showing the ‘Real 3D’ of a no-glasses needed 3D capture, which would have been made with around 70 cameras, each filming a particular angle of the scene so as to fully reproduce it later. Perhaps micro-cameras will facilitate this in the future; much the way microphones have become so automatic and unobtrusive. Who knows, but certainly one day this will be the way 3D is viewed. Unfortunately the price was to high for me- in this case of time, with a 45-minute wait required, and this after a ticket had been gotten elsewhere!
Probably the best-designed booth I went to was the wonderful NHK/JEITA ‘Broadcasting with New Experience ― Equipment from Analog to Digital’, a kind of living room museum experience. I showed typical (well, perhaps even ideal) Japanese living rooms from various decades, from the 1950’s up to today. It then moved into the 3D and 4K possibilities beyond, each shown in largish theatres, by the show’s standards at least. They concentrated on natural images, including some feed from a Japanese space probe surveying the moon with such cameras. A moving and rather a ‘Space Odyssey’ experience, complete with classical music to lend a sense of elegant drama to the new technologies that were so predominant at the show.
All in all, a fabulous show and I hope this report brings some of it home for you. October 04 Park Life BloggingBeing a Sunday, I am naturally enjoying the sun in Kashiwa Noha Park. It feels good to recharge my batteries in it, I feel lucky to be solar-powered. Park Life for me really is the way to go on a Sunday and for anyone else in the area, I really recommend getting a mat, some drinks and snacks and a good book/ebook and enjoying the greenery and good atmosphere before it gets too cold. These are some of the best months of the year, so don't miss out! (Posted from my iPhone:)) October 02 The Zen of Photography Some of you reading this may have tried meditation. I realised that whilst I sometimes do so sitting still, my curiosity and impatience make walking or photographing more realistic options for me on the whole. Perhaps there are many others who feel the same- relaxing as they stroll with a camera, other worlds opening up around them as they do so. Whether they know it or not, they may actually be engaging in meditative states and as their appreciation of the wonder and beauty around them- that is, as their minds awaken to the beauty of the universe we live in- so their phiotographs reflect this. Meditation- the water in the otherwise barren desert of conscious life- may well have found a new and widespread home in this age. When we meditate, it is a good discipline to focus on just one thing. The mind focuses on it and then, by extention,whatever is around it in a non-specific way. The thing becomes as it were, the center of the universe. This induces a peacefulfeeling, as from that perspective, everything is in order, everyhing is in it's place. If one believes that there is a basic ordering principal or energy, or even intelligence behind all things then it is q time to see it clearly. What was hidden to us in the often bewilderingly complex macrosphere in which we live, where seemingly infinite variables combine to create a neccessarily uncertain world is far easier to manage in the smaller space of a meditation on where we are now and what immediately surrounds us. In fact, a sense if the transcendant often appears, where the spiritual underlying reality becomes apparent. Simplicity is good for our minds, it seems. The same happens in photography. A central point of focus is neccessary for the mind to relax enough to dwell in the image. There can be no confusion as to where to rest our eyes as then fatigue quickly sets in. Yet endless details around this focus point are accepted readily. The eyes can wonder over to them, secure in having a resting place. An aesthetic euphoria comes with looking at especially pleasing images. A sense of the beauty of the universe or a taste of the meaning behind our existance is conveyed. There is indeed a zen of photography, living in the moment which is seemingly efffortlessly captured. There is a spirit behind the image, a meaning is there to be found- and perhaps this is easier to convey with images or poetry than attempts at description of a land beyond the known. June 21 The Best of DX?- Nikon's AF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 Lens Nikon's Pro DX Zoom Summer Colours and Green Nikon's elaborately named AF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 DXG IF-ED DX (phew!) is probably the best zoom lens ever made for an APS-C sensor (where it functions as a 26-83mm lens), designed especially for the demands of professionals using it on older generations of pro bodies. Now that the prices of full-frame sensors have come down and pros are gravitating towards them them, anything but consumer-level designs for APS-C are unlikely, so this lens is probably the last of it's kind. This fact though makes them much more avaliable second-hand though, with a newly affordable price. What makes it stand out as a pro-grade lens is the build and fact that it gives a sharp, contrasty picture at any setting or length, with a certain richness to the images that you otherwise need a prime lens or another pro-level zoom to achieve. The high-grade AF-S focusing is also uncannily fast and near-silent. Moth by Day It produces amazing images, images that really 'pop' and stand out with a kind of 3D quality only great lenses have. I have some other really great lenses- the Sigma 50mm f1.4 HSM, the older (but amazingly still produced) Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8D, the Tamron 90mm Di f2.8 macro, which can all take great photos, but the range and usability makes this the most versatile by far. It's like it's part of the camera and just doesn't want to get off! I'm glad because I know that it's about as good an image as a lens could give me, with a wedding you kind of feel bad if you know you could have used something better (even if no-one will notice the difference). For me, it means I can shoot the entire wedding without changing lenses. I used it just the other day and it worked out great! It also looks pro, which helps the general impression.It cost me about $900 second-hand, but a new one would be more like $1,600. Another other cost is the size and weight, due to all the metal and glass, though for me this makes it steadier to hold or balance. Maybe after many hours of carrying it around it would weigh me down and this alone would put a lot of people off it. It should be added that the full-frame equivalents are much heavier and more expensive, without having quite as much reach, (usually being 24-70mm). This shows the convenience of the cropped format for many users. The fact that the images generated are 'good enough' means it will probably live on for many years. Also, the sensor on the D3X is so high resolution it can crop DX at 10MP, ample for most uses and even equal to the D200, which is still in wide use. Whilst the D700 only gives you a tight 5MP, a potential D700X or D800 might give you a lot more, making the use of this on FX cameras quite feasible. Here's a review that was just recently published in, of all places, Poland. The fact that reviews are still being professionally made for this lens just goes to sho it's enduring value. In fact, I would hazard to say that it now has a new lease of life as a much more affordable lens on DX. Let's look at some pros and cons, now as who knows, maybe someone will actually think about buying one based on the strength of this review!? These are all based on my real-world usage, no measurebating or any exact accessment claimed, yet it's quite possible such research would come to the same conclusions through it's own route. Lens quality really does vary, no matter what anyone says and you usually get what you pay for, or in this case what you would have paid for if newer models hadn't emerged (in this case the D700 and the siren cry of full-frame). Pros -Beautiful rendering of colours, contrast, skin-textures backgrounds -A very pleasing bokeh considering the relatively short focal length -Sharp and with little noticable distortion, even at 17mm -Semi-macros are possible with excellent close-up performance and minimum focusing distance (14.2 inches) -A good choice for portraits on DX (though I'd say Nikon's 35-70mm f/2.8D is even better, for a number of reasons) -The perfect event lens on DX- one lens and you're done! -The zoom is very well-damped, making settings at particular lengths (ie 24mm, 35mm) quite convenient -Makes up for the lack of quality wide-angles on DX and covers significant prime lengths- some of which don't even exist in -Nikon's lineup, such as 19mm, which is about 28mm in FX (one of my favourite lengths and a fact not lost on Pentax) -A pro implementation of AF-S, offering very fast, smooth and near-silent focusing -Good prices on the second-hand market -A true pro zoom- in terms of both performance and looks, ensuring people will realise you are, or mistake you for, a pro! Cons -Very heavy, like most true pro-zooms -Still very expensive despite $900 'bargains' being so avaliable -Performance gains compared to buget alternatives may seem subtle to many users, especially when both are stopped down (though I'd say for me they are very significant) -Optomised for wide open, close-up usage, making it unsuitable for landscapes in many people's eyes -Short reach, even on DX, where around 70mm is needed for the 'optimum' portrait length of 105mm (this gives around 83mm being 'uncomfortably close' for many) -Could be redundant if you move to FX and aren't happy with using it cropped there Notice that some of the cons aren't real cons, they just go with the territory. This is for sure an excellent lens (have I already said this?) and one you just will not regret buying! What Does it all Mean for DX? Even though full-frame 'FX' has finally come to Nikon's DSLR's, the options for serious amateurs on DX have never been better. The D200/300 are cheaper than ever and offer fantastic picture quality and ergonomics. Also, along with the price drop of the 17-55 is the emergence of other lenses especially designed with DX bodies and their frequent lack of an in-body motor (in the case of the D40, D60, D5000, all very affordable and even competetive with compact pricing). I speak of the 35mm f/1.8 AF-S DX, the 50mm f/1.4 G and the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 HSM- two of which I have actually aquired for both wedding and home use (though I'll leave you to guess exactly which two for now!) In short, excellent lenses are now widely avaliable for DX use, compromises and beer-bottle zooms are less neccessary for the average user. Of course, the whole format is oversized in a sense, leaving the way open for minaturised 'rangefinderesque' versions like micro-4/3 and potentially a micro-APS... but that's another story... For more samples, please see my 17-55mm Pbase gallery. Some Samples Kashiwa Noha ![]() Feeding the Pigeons ![]() Hydrangeas and Snail-Shell ![]() Silent Rush Hour ![]() May 19 Printing at B4 size (4W, in Japan) Someone asked me how I printed the B4-size prints that I carry around to show people. Whilst years ago that would have been very expensive to print, prices have come down a lot. Here is what I had to say- My B4 prints were made on Fuji Frontier printers at Camera Kitamura, which I believe uses colour lazer printing so it is very fast and detailed. I think just about all camera shops have the same process here in Japan, Fuji dominates and I use the regular quality, though higher qualities are avaliable (such as was used for the exhibition prints). In Japan B4 print size is called 4W, the w meaning 'wide' and uncropped, 6W being an A4 print. If you don't get the wide size, you need to crop, which is neccessary for many frames and is something to think about. A3 prints are about twice the price here, so for me it's not worth it and believe it or not, A4 are more expensive, as I was printing 2 for the price of about 1 (2 for 990 yen). They make great presents as well as ways to show your photos. Though email, web galleries and iPhone-type screens are good for convenience, you have to remember that they are like small prints in terms of resolution, generally around 1/2- 1 and 1/2 mp. Even a 1080p TV set is only 2 mega-pixel worth of detail. Unless you have a very expensive 30 inch, 2560×1600 WQXGA monitor, you have a vastly reduced resolution, despite the brightness and vividness of LCDs being so attractive. In terms of colour, generally they are pretty much like what I see on my monitor. I make sure that any file I use is in SRGB colour. Whilst Adobe RGB or even better Pro-photo RGB have a wider gamut (range of colours), this is more useful for editting than printing on these types of printers- though really high-end ones can make use of the more exact hues. On a standard printer or the internet, though, not being able to display the hues properly can lead to washed out colours appearing in their place- so SRGB is still the usual standard for this. Also, remember that they will probably lighten and warm up the pictures automatically. If you want to get more exact, then you need to communicate with the printer's operator, by showing a sample printed the way you like it, small (which you can experiment with to get just right), or try making a darker and colder-coloured one to compensate. Even then, print it small first as a test print before making the big ones. Why do they do this? It's because photos are usually too dark for printing, much darker than the monitor appears, which is tremendously backlit. Also, especially for portraits or sunsets in particular, warmer colours are more pleasing. I should add that the ones I just got are pretty much the same brightness as on as my monitor, though when I printed from home I had to make them brighter to compensate. Some of them came back a bit warmer, but not so much as to be a distraction. *Note- having just shown some to a friend whose father won numerous photo comnpetitions, he said in each case that the store printing, with it's lighter shadows and warmer hues, looked better to him. I am inclined to agree- especially on prints, they do look more pleasing than a more 'accurate' photo in much cases. I was pleased to hear that my printing choices are working out. Try a couple first and see what you think, I'm happy with it but probably for an exhibition print I would need to get it just right and pay more for the very best quality- though I don't make those much. My home printer is actually capable of finer quality, especially since I can chose the papoer and have it just match the ink being used. Unfortunately, the ink is too expensive to print much large and after all, the Fuji Frontier prints are already so high quality people are amazed. The quantity offered by their affordability helps, especially at large sizes. For the future, I have plans to print A4 size from home at super high quality on my Canon MP 980, on special paper. I'll use those for exhibitions and perhaps another kind of portfolio, encouraging people to look very closely at them. I am already making postcards for people on it, which are incredibly sharp... but that's another story! Quality and quantity are the principals to balance here, as with anything else. |
Other creations and galleries we maintain.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|